Product Code Database
Example Keywords: robots -data $77
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Kanishka
Tag Wiki 'Kanishka'.
Tag

Kanishka I, also known as Kanishka the Great,"The yuga of Sphujiddhvaja and the era of the Kuṣâṇas". Harry Falk. Silk Road Art and Archaeology VII. was an emperor of the , under whose reign (–150 CE) the empire reached its zenith. He is famous for his military, political, and spiritual achievements. A descendant of , founder of the , Kanishka came to rule an empire extending from and to on the .

(2008). 9781605204901, Cosimo, Inc.. .
The main capital of his empire was located at Puruṣapura () in Gandhara, with another major capital at . Coins of Kanishka were found in Tripuri (present-day ).
(2017). 9789352606733, McGraw-Hill Education. .

Although he never converted to the religion, his conquests and patronage of played an important role in the development of the , and in the transmission of Mahayana Buddhism from Gandhara across the range to . Around 127 CE, he replaced with Bactrian as the official language of administration in the empire.The Kushans at first retained the for administrative purposes but soon began to use Bactrian. The Bactrian Rabatak inscription (discovered in 1993 and deciphered in 2000) records that the Kushan king Kanishka the Great (), discarded Greek (Ionian) as the language of administration and adopted Bactrian ("Arya language"), from Falk (2001): "The yuga of Sphujiddhvaja and the era of the Kuṣâṇas." Harry Falk. Silk Road Art and Archaeology VII, p. 133.

Earlier scholars believed that Kanishka ascended the Kushan throne in 78 CE, and that this date was used as the beginning of the . However, historians no longer regard this date as that of Kanishka's accession. Falk estimates that Kanishka came to the throne in 127 CE.Falk (2001), pp. 121–136. Falk (2004), pp. 167–176


Genealogy
There are two theories about Kanisha's origins, both based on the supposition of a separate Kanishka dynasty. The earlier 's is that Kanishka came from , having been summoned as an ethnic ally at the time of troubles after 's reign. Konow supports this theory by citing a Tibetan tradition that a Khotanese expedition to India of about A.D. 120 was commanded by a King Vijayakirti along with a King Kanika and the king of Guzan.
(2009). 9788120833340, Motilal Banarsidass. .
(2003). 9781594777943, Simon and Schuster. .

's similar theory is that Kanishka was originally king of before becoming suzerain of the dynasty as a whole. He cites the above-mentioned epigraph, which may allude to Kushan power reaching the northeast corner of Kashmir, and also the , in which the list of Kushan kings of Kashmir gave Kanishka's name as the third of a sequence, along with the names of Hushka and Jushka. Finally, testimony of Kanishka's activity in Kashmir in favor of the Buddhist faith suggests that he favored the region above others and that he founded as his capital to be close to Kashmir.

He was of ethnicity and his native language was probably Tocharian.

(2025). 9783447061353, Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. .
Kanishka was the successor of , as demonstrated by an impressive genealogy of the Kushan kings, known as the Rabatak inscription.Sims-Williams and Cribb (1995/6), pp. 75–142.Sims-Williams (1998), pp. 79–83. The connection of Kanishka with other Kushan rulers is described in the Rabatak inscription as Kanishka makes the list of the kings who ruled up to his time: as his great-grandfather, as his grandfather, as his father, and himself Kanishka: "for King (his) great grandfather, and for King (his) grandfather, and for King (his) father, and *also for himself, King Kanishka".Sims-Williams and Cribb (1995/6), p. 80.


Conquests in India and Central Asia
Kanishka's empire was certainly vast. It extended from southern and , north of the Amu Darya () in the north west to Northern India, as far as Mathura in the south east (the Rabatak inscription even claims he held and Sri Champa), and his territory also included , where there was a town Kanishkapur (modern day Kanispora), named after him not far from the Pass and which still contains the base of a large stupa.
(1988). 9788184245684, Allied Publishers. .
(2025). 9788176255189, Sarup & Sons. .
The Buddhist text Śrīdharmapiṭakanidānasūtra—known via a Chinese translation made in AD 472—refers to the conquest of Pataliputra by Kanishka.

Knowledge of his hold over Central Asia is less well established. The Hou Hanshu, states that general fought battles near with a Kushan army of 70,000 men led by an otherwise unknown Kushan viceroy named Xie (謝) in 90 AD. Ban Chao claimed to be victorious, forcing the Kushans to retreat by use of a policy. The territories of , and were Chinese dependencies in the , modern . Several coins of Kanishka have been found in the .Hill (2009), p. 11.

Kanishka possibly fought off an invasion by the Parthian Empire in his reign. The war is attested in a single source, a Chinese translation of a lost Sanskrit original, A History of the Buddha's Successors.

(2025). 9780197532782, Oxford University Press.
(full line) and maximum extent of Kushan dominions under Kanishka (dotted line). The conquests in India are according to the Rabatak inscription,"The Rabatak inscription claims that in the year 1 Kanishka I's authority was proclaimed in India, in all the satrapies and in different cities like Koonadeano (Kundina), Ozeno (), Kozambo (Kausambi), Zagedo (), Palabotro () and Ziri-Tambo (Janjgir-Champa). These cities lay to the east and south of Mathura, up to which locality Wima had already carried his victorious arm. Therefore they must have been captured or subdued by Kanishka I himself." Ancient Indian Inscriptions, S. R. Goyal, p. 93. See also the analysis of and J. Cribb, who had a central role in the decipherment: "A new Bactrian inscription of Kanishka the Great", in Silk Road Art and Archaeology No. 4, 1995–1996. Also see, Mukherjee, B. N. "The Great Kushanan Testament", Indian Museum Bulletin. the northern expansion into the is mainly suggested by coin finds and Chinese chronicles.
(1978). 9780226742212, University of Chicago Press. .
]]
, modern .]]
coinage of king Vira Jadamarah, in imitation of the of . , .]]


Kanishka's coins
Kanishka's coins portray images of , , and even - divinities, demonstrating the in his beliefs. Kanishka's coins from the beginning of his reign bear legends in Greek language and script and depict Greek divinities. Later coins bear legends in Bactrian, the Iranian language that the Kushans evidently spoke, and Greek divinities were replaced by corresponding Iranian ones. All of Kanishka's coins – even ones with a legend in the Bactrian language – were written in a modified Greek script that had one additional glyph (Ϸ) to represent /š/ ( sh), as in the word 'Ku shan' and 'Kani shka'.

On his coins, the king is typically depicted as a bearded man in a long coat and trousers gathered at the ankle, with flames emanating from his shoulders. He wears large rounded boots, and is armed with a long sword as well as a lance. He is frequently seen to be making a sacrifice on a small altar. The lower half of a lifesize limestone relief of Kanishka similarly attired, with a stiff embroidered surplice beneath his coat and spurs attached to his boots under the light gathered folds of his trousers, survived in the Kabul Museum until it was destroyed by the Taliban.Wood (2002), illus. p. 39.


Hellenistic phase
A few coins at the beginning of his reign have a legend in the and script: ΒΑΣΙΛΕΥΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΝ ΚΑΝΗϷΚΟΥ, "coin of Kanishka, king of kings."
Greek deities, with Greek names are represented on these early coins:

The inscriptions in Greek are full of spelling and syntactical errors.


Iranian / Indic phase
Following the transition to the Bactrian language on coins, Iranian and Indic divinities replace the Greek ones:

  • ΑΡΔΟΧ ϷΟ ( ardoxsho, )
  • ΛΡΟΟΑΣΠΟ ( lrooaspo, )
  • ΑΘ ϷΟ ( adsho, )
  • ΦΑΡΡΟ ( pharro, personified )
  • ΜΑΟ ( mao, )
  • ΜΙΘΡΟ, ΜΙΙΡΟ, ΜΙΟΡΟ, ΜΙΥΡΟ ( mithro, miiro, mioro, miuro, variants of )
  • ΜΟΖΔΟΟΑΝΟ ( mozdaooano, " the victorious?")
  • ΝΑΝΑ, ΝΑΝΑΙΑ, ΝΑΝΑ ϷΑΟ (variants of pan-Asiatic Nana, Sogdian nny, in a Zoroastrian context Aredvi Sura Anahita)
  • ΜΑΝΑΟΒΑΓΟ ( manaobago, )
  • ΟΑΔΟ ( oado, )
  • ΟΡΑΛΑΓΝΟ ( orlagno, )

Only a few divinities were used as well:

  • ΒΟΔΔΟ ( boddo, ),
  • ϷΑΚΑΜΑΝΟ ΒΟΔΔΟ ( shakamano boddho, Shakyamuni Buddha)
  • ΜΕΤΡΑΓΟ ΒΟΔΔΟ ( metrago boddo, the bodhisattava )

Only a few divinities were used as well:

  • ΟΗ ϷΟ ( , ). A recent study indicate that oesho may be conflated with .Sims-Williams (online) Encyclopedia Iranica.H. Humbach, 1975, pp. 402–408. K. Tanabe, 1997, p. 277, M. Carter, 1995, p. 152. J. Cribb, 1997, p. 40. References cited in De l'Indus à l'Oxus.


Kanishka and Buddhism
In Buddhist tradition Kanishka is regarded as of utmost importance. Although he never converted to Buddhism, he encouraged its teachings and provided royal sponsorship.
(2025). 9789004460645, Brill.
Notably, he administered the 4th Buddhist Council in as the head of the council. It was presided by Vasumitra and Ashwaghosha. Images of the based on 32 physical signs were made during his time.

He encouraged both the school of Greco-Buddhist Art and the Mathura school of art (an inescapable religious syncretism pervades Kushana rule). Kanishka personally seems to have embraced both Buddhism and the Persian attributes but he favored Buddhism, proven by his devotion to Buddhist teachings and prayer styles depicted in various books related to kushan empire.

His greatest contribution to Buddhist architecture was the at Purushapura, modern day . Archaeologists who rediscovered the base of it in 1908–1909 estimated that this stupa had a diameter of 286 feet (87 metres). Reports of Chinese pilgrims such as indicate that its height was 600 to 700 (Chinese) "feet" (= roughly 180–210 metres or 591–689 ft.) and it was covered with jewels.Dobbins (1971).

Kanishka is said to have been particularly close to the Buddhist scholar , who became his religious advisor in his later years.


Buddhist coinage
The Buddhist coins of Kanishka are comparatively rare (well under one percent of all known coins of Kanishka). Several show Kanishka on the obverse and the Buddha standing on the reverse. A few also show the Shakyamuni Buddha and . Like all coins of Kanishka, the design is rather rough and proportions tend to be imprecise; the image of the Buddha is often slightly overdone, with oversize ears and feet spread apart in the same fashion as the Kushan king.

Three types of Kanishka's Buddhist coins are known:


Standing Buddha
Only six Kushan coins of the Buddha are known in gold (the sixth one is the centerpiece of an ancient piece of jewellery, consisting of a Kanishka Buddha coin decorated with a ring of heart-shaped ruby stones). All these coins were minted in gold under Kanishka I, and are in two different denominations: a of about 8 gm, roughly similar to a Roman , and a quarter dinar of about 2 gm. (about the size of an obol).

The Buddha is represented wearing the monastic robe, the , the , and the overcoat .

The ears are extremely large and long, a symbolic exaggeration possibly rendered necessary by the small size of the coins, but otherwise visible in some later Gandharan statues of the Buddha typically dated to the 3rd–4th century CE ( illustration, left). He has an abundant topknot covering the , often highly stylised in a curly or often globular manner, also visible on later Buddha statues of Gandhara.

In general, the representation of the Buddha on these coins is already highly symbolic, and quite distinct from the more naturalistic and Hellenistic images seen in early Gandhara sculptures. On several designs a mustache is apparent. The palm of his right hand bears the mark, and his brow bear the . An , formed by one, two or three lines, surrounds him.

The full gown worn by the Buddha on the coins, covering both shoulders, suggests a Gandharan model rather than a Mathuran one.


"Shakyamuni Buddha"
The Shakyamuni Buddha (with the legend "Sakamano Boudo", i.e. Shakamuni Buddha, another name for the historic Buddha Siddharta Gautama), standing to front, with left hand on hip and forming the abhaya mudra with the right hand. All these coins are in copper only, and usually rather worn.

The gown of the Shakyamuni Buddha is quite light compared to that on the coins in the name of Buddha, clearly showing the outline of the body, in a nearly transparent way. These are probably the first two layers of monastic clothing the and the . Also, his gown is folded over the left arm (rather than being held in the left hand as above), a feature only otherwise known in the and suggestive of a scarf-like . He has an abundant topknot covering the , and a simple or double halo, sometimes radiating, surrounds his head.


"Maitreya Buddha"
The Bodhisattva (with the legend "Metrago Boudo") cross-legged on a throne, holding a water pot, and also forming the Abhaya mudra. These coins are only known in copper and are quite worn out . On the clearest coins, Maitreya seems to be wearing the armbands of an Indian prince, a feature often seen on the statuary of Maitreya. The throne is decorated with small columns, suggesting that the coin representation of Maitreya was directly copied from pre-existing statuary with such well-known features.

The qualification of "Buddha" for Maitreya is inaccurate, as he is instead a (he is the Buddha of the future).

The iconography of these three types is very different from that of the other deities depicted in Kanishka's coinage. Whether Kanishka's deities are all shown from the side, the Buddhas only are shown frontally, indicating that they were copied from contemporary frontal representations of the standing and seated Buddhas in statuary. The Crossroads of Asia, p. 201. (Full here.) Both representations of the Buddha and Shakyamuni have both shoulders covered by their monastic gown, indicating that the statues used as models were from the school of art, rather than Mathura.


Buddhist statuary under Kanishka
Several Buddhist statues are directly connected to the reign of Kanishka, such as several Bodhisattva statues from the , while a few other from are inscribed with a date in an era which is now thought to be the , starting in 186 to 175 BCE.
Dated statuary under Kanishka
File:Standing Bodhisattva Dedicated by Buddhamitra Year 2 of Kanishka.jpg Bodhisattva, inscribed "Year 2 of Kanishka".Early History of Kausambi p.xxi File:Bodhisattva dedicated by Bhikshu Bala at Sarnath 123 CE.jpg, , inscribed "Year 3 of Kanishka". Epigraphia Indica 8 p. 179 File:Kimbell seated Buddha with attendants, Mathura.jpg" Kimbell seated Buddha", with inscription "year 4 of Kanishka" (131 CE).Seated Buddha with inscription starting with 𑁕 Maharajasya Kanishkasya Sam 4 "Year 4 of the Great King Kanishka" in "The Buddhist Triad, from Haryana or Mathura, Year 4 of Kaniska (ad 82). Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth." in
(2025). 9789810567057, World Scientific Pub. .
Another similar statue has "Year 32 of Kanishka".
(2025). 9781588392244, Metropolitan Museum of Art. .
File:Buddhist Triad Peshawar Museum.jpg
Gandhara Buddhist Triad from , , similar to the dated . . File:Nāga between two Nāgīs, inscribed in the year 8 of Emperor Kanishka 135 CE.jpgImage of a Nāga between two Nāgīs, inscribed in "the year 8 of Emperor Kanishka". 135 CE.
(1971). 9788120827905, Motilal Banarsidass Publ.. .
File:Loriya Tangai Buddha.jpg
Buddha from with inscription mentionning the "year 318", thought to be 143 CE. Loriya Tangai standing Buddha.jpgA Buddha from from the same period.


Kanishka stupa
The "" or "Kanishka reliquary", dated to the first year of Kanishka's reign in 127 CE, was discovered in a deposit chamber under , during the archaeological excavations in 1908–1909 in Shah-Ji-Ki-Dheri, just outside the present-day Ganj Gate of the old city of Peshawar.Hargreaves (1910–11), pp. 25–32.Spooner, (1908–9), pp. 38–59. It is today at the Peshawar Museum, and a copy is in the . It is said to have contained three bone fragments of the Buddha, which are now housed in , Burma.

The casket is dedicated in . The inscription reads:

"(*mahara)jasa kanishkasa kanishka-pure nagare aya gadha-karae deya-dharme sarva-satvana hita-suhartha bhavatu mahasenasa sagharaki dasa agisala nava-karmi ana*kanishkasa vihare mahasenasa sangharame"

The text is signed by the maker, a Greek artist named Agesilas, who oversaw work at Kanishka's (caitya), confirming the direct involvement of Greeks with Buddhist realisations at such a late date: "The servant Agisalaos, the superintendent of works at the vihara of Kanishka in the monastery of Mahasena" ("dasa agisala nava-karmi ana*kaniskasa vihara mahasenasa sangharame").

The lid of the casket shows the Buddha on a lotus pedestal, and worshipped by and . The edge of the lid is decorated by a frieze of flying geese. The body of the casket represents a Kushan monarch, probably Kanishka in person, with the Iranian sun and moon gods on his side. On the sides are two images of a seated Buddha, worshiped by royal figures, can be assumed as Kanishka. A garland, supported by goes around the scene in typical Hellenistic style.

The attribution of the casket to Kanishka has been recently disputed, essentially on stylistic ground (for example the ruler shown on the casket is not bearded, to the contrary of Kanishka). Instead, the casket is often attributed to Kanishka's successor .


Kanishka in Buddhist tradition
In Buddhist tradition, Kanishka is often described as an aggressive, hot tempered, rigid, strict, and a bit harsh kind of King before he got converted to Buddhism of which he was very fond, and after his conversion to Buddhism, he became an openhearted, benevolent, and faithful ruler. As in the Sri-dharma-pitaka-nidana sutra:
"At this time the King of Ngan-si (Pahlava) was very aggressive and of a violent nature....There was a bhikshu (monk) arhat who seeing the harsh deeds done by the king wished to make him repent. So by his supernatural force he caused the king to see the torments of hell. The king was terrified and repented and cried terribly and hence dissolved all his negatives within him and got self realised for the first time in life ." Kumar (1973), p. 95.

Additionally, the arrival of Kanishka was reportedly foretold or was predicted by the Buddha, as well as the construction of his stupa:

". . . the Buddha, pointing to a small boy making a mud tope....said that on that spot would erect a tope by his name." Vinaya sutraKumar (1973), p. 91.

The same story is repeated in a scroll found at , which first described how Kanishka would arrive 400 years after the death of the Buddha. The account also describes how Kanishka came to raise his stupa:

"A desire thus arose in Kanishka....at that time the four world-regents learnt the mind of the king. So for his sake they took the form of young boys....and began a stūpa of mud....the boys said to Kanishka 'We are making the .'....At that time the boys changed their form....and said to him, 'Great king, by you according to the Buddha's prophecy is a to be built wholly (?) with a large stūpa and hither relics must be invited which the meritorious good beings...will bring."Kumar (1973). p. 89.

Chinese pilgrims to India, such as , who travelled there around 630 CE also relays the story:

" became sovereign of all Jambudvīpa (Indian subcontinent) but he did not believe in Karma, but he treated Buddhism with honor and respect as he himself converted to Buddhism intrigued by the teachings and scriptures of it. When he was hunting in the wild country a white hare appeared; the king gave a chase and the hare suddenly disappeared at the....when the king lost his patience and took the matter in his own hands and started resurrecting the plans precisely, thus completing the stupas with utmost perfection and perseverance. These two stupas are still in existence and were resorted to for cures by people afflicted with diseases."
King Kanishka because of his deeds was highly respected, regarded, honored by all the people he ruled and governed and was regarded the greatest king who ever lived because of his kindness, humbleness and sense of equality and self-righteousness among all aspects. Thus such great deeds and character of the king Kanishka made his name immortal and thus he was regarded "THE KING OF KINGS", quoted in: Kumar (1973), p. 93.


Transmission of Buddhism to China
Buddhist monks from the region of played a key role in the development and the transmission of Buddhist ideas in the direction of northern Asia from the middle of the 2nd century CE. The monk, Lokaksema (), became the first translator of Buddhist scriptures into Chinese and established a translation bureau at the Chinese capital . Central Asian and East Asian Buddhist monks appear to have maintained strong exchanges for the following centuries.

Kanishka was probably succeeded by . How and when this came about is still uncertain. The inscription on The Sacred Rock of Hunza also shows the signs of Kanishka.


See also


Footnotes
  • (2025). 9782951667921, Association imago-musée de Lattes.
  • Chavannes, Édouard. (1906) "Trois Généraux Chinois de la dynastie des Han Orientaux. Pan Tch'ao (32–102 p. C.); – son fils Pan Yong; – Leang K'in (112 p. C.). Chapitre LXXVII du Heou Han chou." T'oung pao 7, (1906) p. 232 and note 3.
  • Dobbins, K. Walton. (1971). The Stūpa and Vihāra of Kanishka I. The Asiatic Society of Bengal Monograph Series, Vol. XVIII. Calcutta.
  • Falk, Harry (2001): "The yuga of Sphujiddhvaja and the era of the Kuṣâṇas." In: Silk Road Art and Archaeology VII, pp. 121–136.
  • Falk, Harry (2004): "The Kaniṣka era in Gupta records." In: Silk Road Art and Archaeology X (2004), pp. 167–176.
  • Foucher, M. A. 1901. "Notes sur la geographie ancienne du Gandhâra (commentaire à un chapitre de Hiuen-Tsang)." BEFEO No. 4, Oct. 1901, pp. 322–369.
  • Gnoli, Gherardo (2002). "The "Aryan" Language." JSAI 26 (2002).
  • Hargreaves, H. (1910–11): "Excavations at Shāh-jī-kī Dhērī"; Archaeological Survey of India, 1910–11.
  • (1999). 9788120814080, Motilal Banarsidass. .
  • Hill, John E. (2009) Through the Jade Gate to Rome: A Study of the Silk Routes during the Later Han Dynasty, 1st to 2nd centuries CE. BookSurge, Charleston, South Carolina. .
  • (1998). 9780415154819, Routledge.
  • Kumar, Baldev. 1973. The Early . New Delhi, Sterling Publishers.
  • Sims-Williams, Nicholas and Joe Cribb (1995/6): "A New Bactrian Inscription of Kanishka the Great." Silk Road Art and Archaeology 4 (1996), pp. 75–142.
  • Sims-Williams, Nicholas (1998): "Further notes on the Bactrian inscription of Rabatak, with an Appendix on the names of Kujula Kadphises and Vima Taktu in Chinese." Proceedings of the Third European Conference of Iranian Studies Part 1: Old and Middle Iranian Studies. Edited by Nicholas Sims-Williams. Wiesbaden. 1998, pp. 79–93.
  • Sims-Williams, Nicholas. Accessed: 20/12/2010
  • Spooner, D. B. (1908–9): "Excavations at Shāh-jī-kī Dhērī."; Archaeological Survey of India, 1908-9.
  • Wood, Frances (2003). The Silk Road: Two Thousand Years in the Heart of Asia. University of California Press. Hbk (2003), ; pbk. (2004)


External links

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
8s Time